why_orca_slower_than_cura
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| why_orca_slower_than_cura [2025/11/19 20:45] – [Answer:] dshoop | why_orca_slower_than_cura [2025/11/19 20:46] (current) – dshoop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{tag>> | {{tag>> | ||
| - | ===== Issue: ===== | + | ===== Issue: |
| Users report that when they switch from slicing with Cura to slicing with Orca their prints take longer to print.. | Users report that when they switch from slicing with Cura to slicing with Orca their prints take longer to print.. | ||
| - | ====== Answer: ====== | + | ===== Answer: ===== |
| + | |||
| + | It's not. This is a user configuration issue. | ||
| The filament profile Max Volumetric Flow Rate limits overall print speed, as calibration not present in Cura. The default filament profiles for default PLAs and other materials are set to the lowest common denominator to better assure reliable prints yet are normally set significantly lower than necessary for printing. | The filament profile Max Volumetric Flow Rate limits overall print speed, as calibration not present in Cura. The default filament profiles for default PLAs and other materials are set to the lowest common denominator to better assure reliable prints yet are normally set significantly lower than necessary for printing. | ||
/app/data/attic/why_orca_slower_than_cura.1763603155.txt.gz · Last modified: by dshoop