Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- nozzle_types [2025/11/20 03:32] – created dshoop
+++ nozzle_types [2025/11/20 04:30] (current) – dshoop
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==== Why and when would you want to use them? ====
 ==== What's the "best" nozzle? ====
+{{tag> about faq}}
 ===== Overview =====
 Typically nozzles are made of brass, and these are the nozzles that ship with the printer. Brass offers excellent thermal characteristics; it heats quickly and maintains temperature well while transferring heat. This makes it efficient. It's also cheap and easy to produce. It suffers however from being very soft and wears easily, even "soft" filaments like white PLA which contains lots of pigments including titanium will wear the nozzle quickly. Still, considering how cheap brass nozzles are, given the excellent characteristics it's still often preferred to use brass nozzles even with mildly abrasive filaments and replace them after a print or three if you seldom use abrasive materials. Glass fiber filaments are capable of destroying a brass nozzle almost instantly.
+===== Nozzle Characteristics  =====
+=== Hardness ===
+Wear and hardness are directly related. The harder the nozzle the more resistant it will be to wear.
+=== Thermal Conductivity ===
+Higher thermal conductivity is better. It's ability to conduct heat determines how quickly the nozzle can heat up, and how easy to is to maintain temperature. The nozzle's thermal conductivity controls its ability to transfer heat to the filament evenly and quickly flowing through it.
 ===== Nozzle Wear ======
@@ Line 15: / Line 27: @@
 <impact>
 ===== What's abrasive in filaments? =====
@@ Line 35: / Line 48: @@
 === Brass ===
-Already discussed above.
+Mohs hardness: 3.0
+W/m K: 109
+Cost: $1
+Already discussed above. Not recommended for any abrasive filaments.
 === Steel / Stainless Steel ===
-Worse thermal characteristics than brass. Wears better (slower) than brass. Good for general use.
+Mohs: 4 / 6
+W/m K: 8.7/ 14
+Cost: $2
+Poor thermal characteristics. Wears better (slower) than brass and cheap.
 === Hardened Steel ===
+Mohs: 7.5
+W/m K: 41
+Cost: $4
+Higher carbon content in the steel increases the hardness and allows further heat treatment and tempering which also increases hardness.
 Worse thermal characteristics than Steel. Wears better than Steel. Good for Carbon fiber and glass fiber filled materials.
+Needs replaced less than brass or steel.
+=== Bimetal Hardened Steel coated Copper ===
+Cost: $7
+Similar performance to brass yet shares hardened steel's improved wearability.
 === Tungsten Carbide ===
+Mohs: 9.0
+W/m K: 110
+Cost: $29
+Very good overall, yet Silicon Carbide is about the same cost and better.
 === Silicon Carbide ===
+Mohs: 9.5
+W/m K: 120
+Cost: $29
+Best overall balance with excellent hardness and thermal conductivity while balancing.
+Unlikely to need replacement.
 === Ruby ===
+Mohs: 9.0
+W/m K: 35
+Cost: $19
+Balances cost. Often considered "fragile", if the nozzle hits hard metal can crack, though not a natural problem for on the Neptune series. While ruby its is often considered a poor thermal conducer, it's normally coupled with bimetal brass or other materials which have great conductivity and it's not as much of an issue because its only the very thin tip that's ruby.
 === Diamond ===
+Mohs: 10.0
+W/m K: 1500
+Cost: $50 - $95
+Hardest substance overall means incredible wear resistance. Thermal conductivity off the scale. However the most expensive. Yet not likely to ever need replacement,